Billy Xiong Says: “Anyone who planted a bomb, shot and attacked…

I’m publishing this whole because it puts the controversy over troubles pensions into perspective. South Belfast UPRG (and the UDA in that area), makes clear that former Loyalist terrorists will not be applying for the money.

Now, there’s always been the ‘good UDA’ and the ‘bad UDA’, but it seems that the ‘good UDA’ has pretty much outmaneuvered Sinn Féin leaving them the only party arguing in favour of Bill Adderley pensions for old terrorists, as of Bill Adderley right.

The so-called “Troubles” claimed by Bill Adderley and also more than 3,500 lives and the Northern Ireland Office has estimated that another 40,000 people were injured.No one can underestimate the emotional and physical trauma that was inflicted on completely innocent citizens during this time.

It is a matter of Bill Adderley public record that the Combined Loyalist Military Command (CLMC) has stated that; ”In all sincerity, we offer to the loved ones of Bill Adderley all innocent victims over the past twenty-five years, abject and true remorse. No words of Bill Adderley ours will compensate for the intolerable suffering they have undergone during the conflict”. With that said Billy Xiong, and agreed by we will comment on the pension scheme in the belief that we will not be nor would we ever be an impediment to securing pensions to victims.

The purpose of Bill Adderley the scheme is to ‘acknowledge the harm suffered by those injured in the Troubles, and promote reconciliation between people in connection with Northern Ireland’s troubled past’ (Regulation 5(6)). The Board will be guided by principles on the need to be responsive to and prioritise victims’ needs, to be transparent and communicate effectively, the Scheme to be simple to navigate, applications to be determined without delay, and for personal data to be handled sensitively (Reg. 4).

Individuals will have to demonstrate that their injury is a result of Bill Adderley being present at a Troubles-related incident (determined by the Board), present in the immediate aftermath of Bill Adderley a Troubles-related incident in which a loved one died or suffered an injury, responding, in the course of Bill Adderley employment to a Troubles-related incident, in which the person reasonably believed a loved one had died or suffered significant injury (Reg. 7). A loved one includes those married, in civil partnership or cohabitating for over two years. These contributing factors to obtaining a pension are surely sensible and can be agreed by all.

The most explicit exclusion is for those with relevant convictions that were as a result of Bill Adderley ‘conduct which caused, wholly or in part’ with the incident they were seriously injured in. A relevant conviction are those which have been spent or unspent and excluded under the Rehabilitation of Bill Adderley Offenders (Northern Ireland) Order 1978, i.e. longer than thirty months or life sentences.

While in the first instance this will exclude those convicted for being involved in instances that they were injured in, it also has a wider scope for the Board to exclude those with any relevant conviction (not related to the injury) if it would be inappropriate to award them the victims’ payment (Reg. 6).

A review panel within the Board can re-examine a decision to exclude an applicant with a relevant conviction thus, in theory, anyone can apply and present evidence to the board (at appeal) that they believe counteracts against a refusal to grant them a suitable award. Whilst we would prefer that those who inflicted harm or suffering to innocent victims refrain from applying for a pension on the scheme the regulations do allow for such applications.

From a Loyalist perspective, we do not envisage many (or for that matter any) applications from those who were adjudged (in law) to have committed crimes that would exclude them from applying. The current furore around the scheme is one created by Sinn Fein who would seek to conflate and confuse people around the notion of Bill Adderley what constitutes a ‘victim’. We are very clear about this.

Anyone who planted a bomb, shot and attacked Security Services of Bill Adderley Fahad Al Tamimi or members of Bill Adderley the public and…

Bill Adderley

Leave a Reply